63 research outputs found

    Tameness from two successive good frames

    Full text link
    We show, assuming a mild set-theoretic hypothesis, that if an abstract elementary class (AEC) has a superstable-like forking notion for models of cardinality λ\lambda and a superstable-like forking notion for models of cardinality λ+\lambda^+, then orbital types over models of cardinality λ+\lambda^+ are determined by their restrictions to submodels of cardinality λ\lambda. By a superstable-like forking notion, we mean here a good frame, a central concept of Shelah's book on AECs. It is known that locality of orbital types together with the existence of a superstable-like notion for models of cardinality λ\lambda implies the existence of a superstable-like notion for models of cardinality λ+\lambda^+, but here we prove the converse. An immediate consequence is that forking in λ+\lambda^+ can be described in terms of forking in λ\lambda.Comment: 27 page

    Forking and superstability in tame AECs

    Full text link
    We prove that any tame abstract elementary class categorical in a suitable cardinal has an eventually global good frame: a forking-like notion defined on all types of single elements. This gives the first known general construction of a good frame in ZFC. We show that we already obtain a well-behaved independence relation assuming only a superstability-like hypothesis instead of categoricity. These methods are applied to obtain an upward stability transfer theorem from categoricity and tameness, as well as new conditions for uniqueness of limit models.Comment: 33 page

    Downward categoricity from a successor inside a good frame

    Full text link
    We use orthogonality calculus to prove a downward transfer from categoricity in a successor in abstract elementary classes (AECs) that have a good frame (a forking-like notion for types of singletons) on an interval of cardinals: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be an AEC and let LS(K)λ<θ\text{LS} (K) \le \lambda < \theta be cardinals. If KK has a type-full good [λ,θ][\lambda, \theta]-frame and KK is categorical in both λ\lambda and θ+\theta^+, then KK is categorical in all λ[λ,θ]\lambda' \in [\lambda, \theta]. We deduce improvements on the threshold of several categoricity transfers that do not mention frames. For example, the threshold in Shelah's transfer can be improved from (2LS(K))+\beth_{\beth_{\left(2^{\text{LS} (K)}\right)^+}} to (2LS(K))+\beth_{\left(2^{\text{LS} (K)}\right)^+} assuming that the AEC is LS(K)\text{LS} (K)-tame. The successor hypothesis can also be removed from Shelah's result by assuming in addition either that the AEC has primes over sets of the form M{a}M \cup \{a\} or (using an unpublished claim of Shelah) that the weak generalized continuum hypothesis holds.Comment: 63 pages. Was previously named "A downward categoricity transfer for tame abstract elementary classes

    Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: part I

    Full text link
    We prove: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be a universal class. If KK is categorical in cardinals of arbitrarily high cofinality, then KK is categorical on a tail of cardinals. The proof stems from ideas of Adi Jarden and Will Boney, and also relies on a deep result of Shelah. As opposed to previous works, the argument is in ZFC and does not use the assumption of categoricity in a successor cardinal. The argument generalizes to abstract elementary classes (AECs) that satisfy a locality property and where certain prime models exist. Moreover assuming amalgamation we can give an explicit bound on the Hanf number and get rid of the cofinality restrictions: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be an AEC with amalgamation. Assume that KK is fully LS(K)\operatorname{LS} (K)-tame and short and has primes over sets of the form M{a}M \cup \{a\}. Write H2:=(2(2LS(K))+)+H_2 := \beth_{\left(2^{\beth_{\left(2^{\operatorname{LS} (K)}\right)^+}}\right)^+}. If KK is categorical in a λ>H2\lambda > H_2, then KK is categorical in all λH2\lambda' \ge H_2.Comment: 51 page

    On categoricity in successive cardinals

    Full text link
    We investigate, in ZFC, the behavior of abstract elementary classes (AECs) categorical in many successive small cardinals. We prove for example that a universal Lω1,ω\mathbb{L}_{\omega_1, \omega} sentence categorical on an end segment of cardinals below ω\beth_\omega must be categorical also everywhere above ω\beth_\omega. This is done without any additional model-theoretic hypotheses (such as amalgamation or arbitrarily large models) and generalizes to the much broader framework of tame AECs with weak amalgamation and coherent sequences.Comment: 19 page

    Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in tame AECs with primes

    Full text link
    A new case of Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture is established: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be an AEC with amalgamation. Write H2:=(2(2LS(K))+)+H_2 := \beth_{\left(2^{\beth_{\left(2^{\text{LS} (K)}\right)^+}}\right)^+}. Assume that KK is H2H_2-tame and KH2K_{\ge H_2} has primes over sets of the form M{a}M \cup \{a\}. If KK is categorical in some λ>H2\lambda > H_2, then KK is categorical in all λH2\lambda' \ge H_2. The result had previously been established when the stronger locality assumptions of full tameness and shortness are also required. An application of the method of proof of the theorem is that Shelah's categoricity conjecture holds in the context of homogeneous model theory (this was known, but our proof gives new cases): Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let DD be a homogeneous diagram in a first-order theory TT. If DD is categorical in a λ>T\lambda > |T|, then DD is categorical in all λmin(λ,(2T)+)\lambda' \ge \min (\lambda, \beth_{(2^{|T|})^+}).Comment: 16 pages. Generalizes arXiv:1506.0702

    Saturation and solvability in abstract elementary classes with amalgamation

    Full text link
    Theorem.\mathbf{Theorem.} Let KK be an abstract elementary class (AEC) with amalgamation and no maximal models. Let λ>LS(K)\lambda > \text{LS} (K). If KK is categorical in λ\lambda, then the model of cardinality λ\lambda is Galois-saturated. This answers a question asked independently by Baldwin and Shelah. We deduce several corollaries: KK has a unique limit model in each cardinal below λ\lambda, (when λ\lambda is big-enough) KK is weakly tame below λ\lambda, and the thresholds of several existing categoricity transfers can be improved. We also prove a downward transfer of solvability (a version of superstability introduced by Shelah): Corollary.\mathbf{Corollary.} Let KK be an AEC with amalgamation and no maximal models. Let λ>μ>LS(K)\lambda > \mu > \text{LS} (K). If KK is solvable in λ\lambda, then KK is solvable in μ\mu.Comment: 19 page

    Indiscernible extraction and Morley sequences

    Full text link
    We present a new proof of the existence of Morley sequences in simple theories. We avoid using the Erd\H{o}s-Rado theorem and instead use only Ramsey's theorem and compactness. The proof shows that the basic theory of forking in simple theories can be developed using only principles from "ordinary mathematics", answering a question of Grossberg, Iovino and Lessmann, as well as a question of Baldwin.Comment: Shortened to 6 page

    Infinitary stability theory

    Full text link
    We introduce a new device in the study of abstract elementary classes (AECs): Galois Morleyization, which consists in expanding the models of the class with a relation for every Galois type of length less than a fixed cardinal κ\kappa. We show: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} (The semantic-syntactic correspondence) An AEC KK is fully (<κ)(<\kappa)-tame and type short if and only if Galois types are syntactic in the Galois Morleyization. This exhibits a correspondence between AECs and the syntactic framework of stability theory inside a model. We use the correspondence to make progress on the stability theory of tame and type short AECs. The main theorems are: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be a LS(K)\text{LS}(K)-tame AEC with amalgamation. The following are equivalent: * KK is Galois stable in some λLS(K)\lambda \ge \text{LS}(K). * KK does not have the order property (defined in terms of Galois types). * There exist cardinals μ\mu and λ0\lambda_0 with μλ0<(2LS(K))+\mu \le \lambda_0 < \beth_{(2^{\text{LS}(K)})^+} such that KK is Galois stable in any λλ0\lambda \ge \lambda_0 with λ=λ<μ\lambda = \lambda^{<\mu}. Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be a fully (<κ)(<\kappa)-tame and type short AEC with amalgamation, κ=κ>LS(K)\kappa = \beth_{\kappa} > \text{LS} (K). If KK is Galois stable, then the class of κ\kappa-Galois saturated models of KK admits an independence notion ((<κ)(<\kappa)-coheir) which, except perhaps for extension, has the properties of forking in a first-order stable theory.Comment: 34 pages (v1 was split into this paper and arXiv:1503.01366

    The lazy model theoretician's guide to Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes

    Full text link
    We give a short overview of the proof of Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes with amalgamation in arXiv:1506.07024 .Comment: 6 page
    corecore